You assumed cloud storage wouldn’t be too expensive – until the invoice hit.
What started out as a budget-friendly $0.02 per GB promise turned into a tangled web of charges for accessing, moving, or even just using your own data. Suddenly, you’re paying for API requests, egress, tiered retrieval, and storage lifecycle policies – costs that were never displayed front and centre during the procurement process.
This is the unfortunate reality of cloud storage Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). It’s not just about how much it costs to store your data – it’s about everything it costs to use it: backup jobs, data restores, disaster recovery, compliance checks, API-heavy applications. And the more your organisation relies on the cloud, the harder it becomes to predict what your monthly bill will look like.
This lack of transparency has led to a widespread problem among hyperscaler customers … hidden fee fatigue. I.T. teams are left frustrated, finance teams are blindsided, and storage strategies become reactive instead of planned.
But it doesn’t have to be like this! Newer cloud storage models – like Cloudlake’s Immutable Cloud Storage powered by Wasabi’s flat-rate, no hidden-fee approach – are changing the game by removing the “surprise” costs that distort your TCO.
In this article, we’ll break down:
- What cloud TCO really means (and why it’s often misunderstood)
- The hidden fees that wreck costing models
- How unpredictable billing affects backup and recovery strategies
- Why predictable pricing is the new priority
- And how you can finally take back control
What is TCO in Cloud Computing?
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) in cloud computing refers to the full, end-to-end cost of using a cloud service over time – not just the upfront storage rate you see on a pricing page.
Too often, organisations are drawn in by low per-gigabyte pricing without realising that storing the data is only part of the story. True TCO includes every cost incurred in the day-to-day use, access, management, and retrieval of that data – which can add up fast.
TCO in cloud storage typically includes:
- Raw data storage – the baseline cost per GB stored
- API interactions – charges for each PUT, GET, LIST, or DELETE request
- Egress fees – costs for downloading your own data out of the cloud
- Restore and retrieval costs – especially from cold/archive tiers
- Archival access – fees to access long-term stored data
- Lifecycle management fees – automated tiering, retention policies, transitions
- Support, tools, and overhead – third-party software, monitoring tools, admin time – third-party software, monitoring tools, admin time
Why does this matter?
Because TCO is more than just the storage price – and it’s easy to underestimate how much you’ll really spend once the cloud is integrated into backup, analytics, disaster recovery, or compliance workflows.
Take a common example:
A mid-sized company runs daily backups of application data to cloud storage. Their backup software performs thousands of PUT and GET requests each day to create, verify, and manage those backups.
On paper, they’re only storing 10TB – but due to API request charges and egress during DR testing, their monthly costs are 3–4x higher than anticipated.
Understanding TCO isn’t about scare tactics – it’s about being realistic, prepared, and able to forecast your cloud spend with confidence.
TCO vs ROI: What’s the difference?
TCO and ROI are two sides of the same financial equation – but serve very different purposes…
TCO (Total Cost of Ownership)
Tells you how much something costs over its full lifecycle.
It includes all the direct and hidden costs of using a cloud service: storage, API calls, data access, support, maintenance, and more.
ROI (Return on Investment)
Tells you how much value or benefit you get back from that spend.
It weighs the total cost (TCO) against the outcomes: improved uptime, faster restores, reduced risk, operational savings, or business enablement.
A simple way to think of it:
TCO is the price tag. ROI is whether the purchase was worth it.
Let’s say you invest in immutable cloud storage for disaster recovery…
- TCO includes the storage fees, backup software costs, API interactions, and restore bandwidth
- ROI comes from reduced downtime, avoided ransomware payments, and the ability to restore services within the SLA
Why does this matter?
Because you can’t measure ROI until you know your TCO.
If you’re only looking at headline storage pricing, you’re missing the real cost baseline – and risk misjudging the value of your cloud strategy entirely.
Understanding TCO is the first step toward making smarter, outcome-driven cloud investments.
The Hidden Fees That Wreck Your Cost Model
On paper, cloud storage looks simple: a low monthly cost per gigabyte or terabyte. In practice, hyperscalers make their money on everything that happens around that storage – the constant API calls, restores, transitions, and data movements that keep your business running. These are the fees that quietly inflate your cloud Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and make monthly bills almost impossible to predict.
Below are the main culprits:
API Request Charges (PUT, GET, DELETE, LIST)
Every interaction with cloud storage is billed as an API call. Your backup software, security tools, monitoring systems, and applications all generate thousands to millions of requests – and hyperscalers charge for each one.
- PUT = writing data
- GET = reading or restoring data
- LIST = browsing metadata
- DELETE = removing objects
For high-churn workloads, these requests can quickly become a significant percentage of your monthly bill.
As highlighted in Wasabi’s analysis, some environments generate so many PUT requests that API fees alone can exceed the cost of the storage itself.
Egress Fees (Downloading Your Own Data)
Hyperscalers charge between $0.05–$0.12 per GB to download data out of their cloud.
That means every restore, failover test, analytics job, or migration carries a variable tax.
For example:
Restoring 5 TB after a ransomware attack could cost £250–£600 just in egress, before you’ve even begun the recovery process.
This is a major reason why organisations fear restoring data – it’s not the downtime that hurts, it’s the bill.
Access Tiering Fees (Cold and Archive Retrieval)
Cold and archive tiers look cheap until you actually need the data.
Retrieval fees apply when you pull data back from deep storage, and if you access it too frequently, your provider may automatically “promote” it to a more expensive tier.
The problem?
Most organisations don’t realise their backup and DR workflows trigger unexpected retrievals.
Early Deletion Fees
Cold-tier and archive data often comes with mandatory retention periods (e.g., 30, 60, or 90 days).
If you delete or move data before the period ends, hyperscalers charge an “early deletion” penalty – regardless of whether the deletion was intentional or due to automation.
This is particularly painful for high-rotation backups.
Data Scanning or Analytics Charges
If you run analytics, indexing, compliance scans, or object queries, hyperscalers will bill you for the CPU, metadata reads, and scanning operations required.
This impacts:
- SIEM/EDR tools
- Backup search tools
- Log analysis
- Compliance workflows
All of which can dramatically increase monthly variability.
The Core Problem: Unpredictability
The biggest issue isn’t that these fees exist – it’s that they’re unpredictable, workload-dependent, and almost impossible to forecast accurately.
- Backup schedules fluctuate
- Restore events are unpredictable
- Data churn varies
- DR tests don’t follow a consistent pattern
- API volumes spike during audits or migrations
This leads directly to the phenomenon Wasabi calls hidden-fee fatigue: the frustration companies feel when their monthly cloud bill is radically different from what they expected.
As one real-world example:“Backups alone can rack up millions of PUT requests per day – even for mid-sized businesses. That’s how some organisations end up spending more on API calls than on storage.”
How Hidden Costs Disrupt Backup, Recovery—and Your TCO Model
Hidden fees in cloud storage don’t just inflate your invoice – they actively interfere with your ability to run a reliable, resilient backup and recovery strategy.
Backup Jobs Throttled by API Costs
Modern backup software relies on rapid, high-frequency API interactions – every backup set, incremental change, or metadata check generates thousands of PUT and GET requests. When each API call carries a fee, organisations start throttling backup schedules to control costs.
That leads to dangerous trade-offs:
- Fewer backups
- Longer RPOs
- Less frequent snapshots
- Gaps in data coverage
In other words, cost control starts dictating data protection.
Restore Times Impacted by Bandwidth and Egress Limits
When you need to restore data – fast – unexpected egress fees or throttling policies can delay recovery. Many hyperscalers limit bandwidth or apply per-GB charges that discourage large restores.
This can lead to:
- Slower RTOs (Recovery Time Objectives)
- Pressure to restore only “partial” systems
- Hesitation to test restores due to cost
Disaster Recovery (DR) Testing Becomes Too Expensive
Disaster recovery planning isn’t just about having backups – it’s about testing that they work. But with every test restore triggering egress charges, API activity, and potentially early deletion fees, many organisations avoid testing regularly to save money.
This undermines resilience. You can’t rely on a DR plan you haven’t validated.
The Bigger Risk: Cloud Cost Unpredictability Undermines Resilience
Unpredictable costs change behaviour. IT teams start pulling back on best practices – fewer backups, less DR testing, more shortcuts – just to stay within budget. That’s how you end up with beautifully stored data that’s useless when it counts.
What begins as a budgeting issue becomes a resilience failure.
Common TCO Mistakes That Lead to Risk
Here are the mis-steps we see most often:
- Relying only on the advertised price per GB
- Failing to monitor API transaction volumes
- Using cold/archive tiers for high-churn data
- Assuming DR testing is cost-free
- Not budgeting for large-scale data retrieval during incidents
All of these are avoidable – but only if you’re modelling Total Cost of Ownership accurately, based on how your systems actually behave.
Why Predictable Pricing Should Be A Priority
When it comes to cloud storage, low pricing is good – but predictable pricing is better.
Advertised costs like “$0.01 per GB” may look attractive, but if your monthly invoice swings wildly based on usage patterns, restores, or test cycles, that “cheap” storage quickly becomes a budgeting nightmare.
For most businesses, uncertainty is more dangerous than cost. That’s why predictable pricing should be a top priority – especially in multi-cloud and hybrid environments where billing complexity scales fast.
Why Predictability Matters to Finance
Finance leaders don’t just want good value – they want cost certainty.
Surprise cloud bills:
- Blow up forecasts
- Disrupt cash flow
- Undermine confidence in I.T. Procurement
Predictable pricing allows finance teams to model costs over 12–36 months with accuracy, helping them justify cloud strategy at the board level.
Why IT Teams Need Cost Clarity
When cloud costs are volatile, IT teams become reactive. They start delaying DR testing, extending backup intervals, or avoiding full restores – not because it’s best practice, but because they’re afraid of the bill.
Predictable pricing:
- Enables confident DR and restore planning
- Encourages regular testing
- Supports resilience-first architecture without second-guessing cost impact
Predictable Pricing Enables Better Business Decisions
It’s not just a technical advantage – it unlocks better strategic planning across:
Budgeting – Fixed-rate pricing removes guesswork
Procurement – Easier to compare vendors and justify spend
Risk modelling – More accurate cost forecasts for DR or outage scenarios
Long-term planning – Supports multi-year strategies with cost transparency
In short: if you can’t predict your storage bill, you can’t control it – and you definitely can’t optimise it. That’s why newer cloud models, like Cloudlake’s flat-rate pricing, are winning attention from CIOs and CFOs alike.
What is TCO in cloud computing?
TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) is the full cost of using cloud storage over time – including storage, egress, API calls, retrievals, and support.
How do you calculate cloud TCO?
First, add up the following:
- Storage costs
- Egress/download fees
- API request charges
- Tiering or retrieval costs
- Software/licensing/support overheads
Then, model those costs based on real usage, not just capacity.
What costs are included in TCO (beyond just storage)?
Egress, API calls, archive retrieval, early deletion penalties, scanning/analytics, and backup/DR software costs – often where the real spend happens.
Why is cloud TCO often underestimated?
Because pricing is marketed per GB or per TB, but actual use drives the bill – especially during backup jobs, restores, or compliance events.
How do API calls and egress fees impact TCO?
They scale with usage. Millions of PUT/GET requests or a large restore can double or triple your bill – often without warning.
TCO vs ROI: What’s the difference?
TCO is what it costs.
ROI is whether it’s worth it
You need to understand your TCO before you can measure your ROI.
What are common TCO mistakes?
- Relying only on storage price
- Ignoring API/egress fees
- Using cold storage for active data
- Underestimating DR testing costs
- Not monitoring usage patterns
Why does predictable pricing matter?
It enables clear budgeting, avoids bill shock, and gives your I.T. and Finance teams the confidence to plan, test, and scale without second-guessing cost.
What’s the difference between hyperscaler and Wasabi pricing?
| Hyperscaler | Wasabi | |
| Egress Fees | Yes | No |
| API Call Charges | Yes | No |
| Tiered Pricing | Yes | No – Flat-rate |
| Predictability | Low | High |
How does Wasabi help reduce TCO?
By eliminating surprise fees. With Wasabi, you pay one flat rate per GB – no egress, no API fees, no tiering – making storage costs simple and predictable.